Talk:The Old Millinery

We need to separate the quest spoilers from the location information Dcorrin (talk) 17:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * We have a Quests category, so how about a separate quest page for each quest, and just having a list in the location page. That at least keeps the details a click away. I've been unable to find a list of quests though, so not sure what to name quests...could just make up names I suppose... --Fig bucket (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * There are two reasons to consult this sort of wiki. One is to get general assistance with locations and where to find things. Quite often people want a bit of help in a game, but don't want all the puzzles spelled out for them, others want that. I stongly beleive that this is not a pure walkthrough and having all the puzzles solved on basic location pages will negatively affect some people. Dcorrin (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Wikis are spoilers by their nature and it makes more sense to have all the information about a location on one page, including the quest info. CrsBenjamin (talk) 18:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Fine. We disagree. I was trying to make it similar to the KoL wiki format. Do it how you want.
 * I don't want to "win" the argument, I'd like to come to a consensus. Getting more insight on your thought is good. I think the main difference is that locations in KoL have a lot more to them (e.g. multiple quests or sub-locations) and quests are distinct (e.g. you have a log for them). In WoL, locations seem to mostly be related to a single quest and quests aren't really tracked separately (from what I've seen so far) which leads me to believe that there's less of a need to create separate pages. CrsBenjamin (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The KoL wiki is intensely spoiler-y, and I do kind of expect that of this (or any really) game wiki. I thought quests might be separate "things", like with KoL, which would then deserve their own page, but it's still unclear to me how complex and separated they are---for simple, location-specific puzzles then in-page does seem better.  If the page for this location had more general content---an image, a map, maybe lists of sub-locations, people, things, etc (I haven't found this place in the game yet so I've no idea what would be interesting to list here), then the actual puzzle spoilers would not be so front and centre. --Fig bucket (talk) 19:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That's really my only point as well. This location is wholly built around this quest, there's no other reason you would come here (indeed, unclear if you COULD even go there without being on the quest). Without that info, it becomes a super short stub of a page. CrsBenjamin (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)